How it works
From everyday creations to a clear read on strengths.
You share what your child already made. We return a structured, parent-readable report: what shows up strongly, what to nurture next, and why we think so.
The flow
Play a quick walkthrough, or scroll the cards below.
- 1
Share work
Drawings, writing, audio, video, or school PDFs.
- Takes about a minute: upload and add a short note if you want.
- No special prep. Ordinary creations are enough.
- 2
Careful review
Several models read the material in parallel.
- Signals are cross-checked so one quirky answer does not steer the whole report.
- Established learning frameworks inform what we emphasize.
- 3
Synthesis
Findings are merged into one coherent picture.
- Cognitive, creative, social, and other lenses are weighed together.
- Your note can adjust emphasis where it matters.
- 4
Your report
Tree, strengths, and practical next steps.
- Interactive talent map plus activities that fit your child.
- Come back anytime; new uploads extend the story.
What to upload
Variety helps. You do not need perfect files or a big portfolio.
- Art and photos
- Stories and school writing
- Music and voice memos
- Short videos
- PDFs and scans (OCR)
Repeating over time sharpens trends. Each new upload refines the picture.
What you see in the report
PERMA Wellbeing Profile
Seligman's PERMA model: Positive Emotion, Engagement (flow), Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment. Each scored 0–25.
Multiple Intelligences
Gardner’s model: eight ways children learn and show strengths (0–10 each). We highlight stronger areas.
Mindset Orientation
Dweck Mindset: orientation from Fixed (−1) to Growth (+1). Higher values indicate growth signals in behavior and language.
Gagné Development
Gagné’s DMGT: how natural gifts become talents through practice and catalysts. Stage shows current progression (Emerging → Perfected).
Actionable ideas
Activities and next steps matched to what showed up in the work, not generic worksheets.
Personalized materials
How we generate learning content when you want to go deeper.
How confident is each call?
Explanations are labeled so you know when the evidence is strong versus when we need more samples.
High
Strong agreement and clear evidence in the work.
Medium
Directionally useful; more uploads will firm it up.
Open
Treat as a question, not a verdict. Add another artifact.
Open the “AI insights” control on any analysis for the full rationale.
After the first run
You have the report. A calm order to explore it, without a checklist vibe.
Explore the talent map
See how strengths connect, not just a single score.
Try one recommendation
Pick a single next step so it stays realistic.
Upload again later
Month to month, the arc becomes easier to read.
Share when it helps
Export or loop in a teacher or clinician on your terms.